Showing posts with label Dublin Docklands Authority. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dublin Docklands Authority. Show all posts

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Monday, February 2, 2009

Irish Times & Labour Party Spin For Developers Autocracy (DDDA)



Very Curious.

Following its lazy, or otherwise practice, The Irish Times seems to have yet again issued a DDDA press release on behalf of the Dublin Developer's Autocracy (DDDA). The Developer's Autocracy seems to directly use The Irish Times and The Labour Party's Councillor Humphries to perform its PR and spin, coordinated by it's own in-house spin department.

The DDDA Developer's Autocracy should be shut down. It no longer serves its original social purpose. Who does the DDDA Developer's Autocracy work for besides the directors of Fianna Fails developers' bank (Anglo-Irish) and its own DDDA directors and their colleagues in the tent?


Dublin Developer's Autocracy (DDDA) & Gerrymander

It is curious that Cllr Humphries distributes leaflets on behalf of DDDA for its cynically titled "public consultations". Cllr Humphries has not distributed leaflets about the close relationships between DDDA and Anglo-Irish Bank. He does not explain how these relationships can be fully trustworthy.

Cllr Humphries leaflets were distributed to part of the electoral district apparently gerrymandered to the benefit of the Developers Autocracy, and split as urged by Cllr Humphries. It is especially curious that DDDA, to date, has not itself issued household flyers about the alleged "consultations". This smells more strongly than the Poolbeg Sewage Factory. It smells of The Big Lie.

And it will be interesting to see if the rest of the gerrymandered district is notified. And it will be interesting to see if the "consultations" continue to be held in locations at a considerable distance from the large population around Dublin Bay.

Very Curious & totally consistent with The Big Lie methodology, however accidentally.


Irish Times Needs Developer's Autocracy Advertising Money


The Irish Times gains advertising revenue from the Dublin Developer's Autocracy - a minimal disclosure omitted from the Irish Times 'article' dated Feb 2, 2009.

Example of Irish Times journalism:
"The plans, once they are ratified by the Minister for the Environment, ..."

A credible journalist or a minimally pretending journalist would at least say IF they are ratified. And then add some critical insight to inform the public.

This same lazy, or otherwise journalist, also reprinted press releases taken more or less directly from the promoters of the Poolbeg Incinerator at the politically biased EPA Oral Hearings in 2008.

This same lazy, or otherwise journalist, does not mention any possible conflicts of interest at the Dublin Developer's Autocracy:
  • Dublin Developer's Autocracy dictates planning permission at Poolbeg
  • The public can not appeal decisions
  • Dublin Developer's Autocracy bypasses Bord Pleanala
  • Dublin Developer's Autocracy "invested" taxpayer money in the IGB site and lost most of that money (information is currently withheld; ask Seanie to confirm probable write-offs are €400,000,000.)
  • Revolving doors between Anglo Irish Bank's auditors, Price Waterhouse Coopers auditors/accountants/directors, DDDA Developers Autocracy, Anglo-Irish, RPS Consulting, Dublin City Council, Incineration Promoters, EPA Ireland, Ex-EPA Ireland "consultants", Covanta & Dong, Indaver, Energy Answers, An Bord Pleanala, ...
  • Apparently the honest Directors at the Dublin Developer's Autocracy have a longstanding history of "working closely with" the honest Directors of Anglo Irish Bank.

The Irish Times journalist and the editor should be posted to New Orleans as they are "doing a mighty fine job".



____________

Dublin Developers Autocracy, Dublin Docklands Authority, Poolbeg, Poolbeg Incinerator, Councillor Humphreys,

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Shut Cross-Contaminated Developer's Autocracy (DDDA)

KEEP OUT!
DEVELOPERS AUTOCRACY!

_____________________

Bradshaw Fits Patrick Fits Bradshaw.

  • During the watch of the honourable Bradshaw and the honourable FitzPatrick the Dirty Dublin Developers Autocracy (DDDA) defined historic sections of Sandymount Strand and Ireland's national heritage as part of their docklands empire, signed off by Dick Roach, thus destroying James Joyce's elated moment on Sandymount Strand with his hand in his own pocket.
  • The pair were also co-investors in a number of projects, including Fresh Mortgages, the Irish sub-prime lender that suspended its new loans in November. Most of their investments have not been publicised.
Their dual memberships of the Anglo and DDDA boards drew criticism from various quarters, given the bank’s involvement in funding projects in the area. In particular, the DDDA was a large investor along with Bernard McNamara and others in a vehicle called Becbay that paid €412 million to buy the former Irish Glass site in Ringsend. That transaction was funded by Anglo. Check it yourself

_____________________


Niamh Brennan Opinion: "Aithníonn ciaróg ciaróg eile"
Extracts
  • Seán FitzPatrick and Lar Bradshaw were what is called, interlocking directors - Seán FitzPatrick served on the board of the Dublin Docklands Development Authority where Lar Bradshaw was chairman and vice versa.
However, the board expressed its "complete satisfaction" that the independence of the directors was not compromised, notwithstanding these three breaches of best practice standards.
...

In the final analysis, no laws, no rules, no regulations can prevent greedy, self-serving behaviour by company directors. All they can do is make such behaviour harder to engage in. Add to this, that greedy, self-serving people seek each other out. The old Irish phrase "Aithníonn ciaróg ciaróg eile" (one "beetle" recognises another) captures this aspect of corporate life beautifully. More at Irish Times.

Niamh Brennan is Michael MacCormac professor of management at University College Dublin, and is academic director of the Centre for Corporate Governance at UCD

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2008/1220/1229725700373.html

____________

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/finance/2008/1220/1229725700366_pf.html

Bradshaw quits as joint loan with FitzPatrick revealed

CIARÁN HANCOCK, Business Affairs Correspondent

Sat, Dec 20, 2008

SEÁN FITZPATRICK’S resignation from Anglo Irish Bank on Thursday grabbed all the headlines, but he wasn’t the only director to fall on his sword.

Former McKinsey Ireland chief Lar Bradshaw also took his leave after it emerged that he had taken out a joint loan with Mr FitzPatrick, which was temporarily transferred to Irish Nationwide Building Society before its September 30th year-end.

This had the effect of hiding the loan from shareholders in the bank’s annual report.

The size of this joint loan was not revealed and Mr FitzPatrick said Mr Bradshaw had “no knowledge” of the temporary transfer of the funds.

Born in Dublin in 1960, Bradshaw spent 20 years with the blue chip management consulting firm McKinsey, working overseas and latterly as managing director of its Irish operation, which he founded.

He holds a Master’s in Business Administration degree from IMD in Switzerland.

Records at the Companies Registration Office show that he holds 12 directorships here, although that included Anglo.

He is listed as executive chairman of Cove Capital.

Bradshaw and FitzPatrick not only served together on the board of Anglo, which Bradshaw joined in 2004 – they were also both board members of the Dublin Docklands Development Authority, which had a multi-billion budget to redevelop 1,300 acres in the faded docks area.

The pair were also co-investors in a number of projects, including Fresh Mortgages, the Irish sub-prime lender that suspended its new loans in November. Most of their investments have not been publicised.

It did emerge, however, that Bradshaw invested in the Derek Quinlan-led group that backed the Four Seasons Hotel in Dublin.

On May 3rd, 1997, Bradshaw was appointed as chairman of the fledgling DDDA by John Bruton’s coalition government, a position he held for 10 years. He was said at the time to have no political affiliations.

At the time of his appointment, The Irish Times quoted a source as saying that Bradshaw was chosen to head the DDDA because of his “relative youth, expertise and incredible vision”.

Their dual memberships of the Anglo and DDDA boards drew criticism from various quarters, given the bank’s involvement in funding projects in the area.

In particular, the DDDA was a large investor along with Bernard McNamara and others in a vehicle called Becbay that paid €412 million to buy the former Irish Glass site in Ringsend.

That transaction was funded by Anglo.

Small in stature, Bradshaw was described by one senior financier as a “good man for building relationships and making introductions, but not one for detailed negotiations”.

One source said he successfully built relationships with the existing local communities in the Docklands, who found their daily lives disrupted enormously by the major construction work that has taken place over the past decade.

“He was able to play the role of the ‘real Dub’ even though he was groomed by McKinsey,” said one source. “It was a neat trick.”

Following his resignation from Anglo, and the questions that remain about the circumstances of his joint loan, Bradshaw will need all of his skills of persuasion if he is to rebuild his reputation.

© 2008 The Irish Times

=====================

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Reputation of Ireland Inc is under spotlight after resignations

OPINION: There are questions about the behaviour of Anglo's board and management, the auditors and the regulators, writes Niamh Brennan

THE REPUTATION of Ireland Inc is again under the spotlight with the resignation of Anglo Irish Bank's chairman Seán FitzPatrick, chief executive David Drumm and non-executive director Lar Bradshaw for their roles in hiding loans to Seán Fitzpatrick from shareholders.

Seán FitzPatrick's loan raises many questions. Will the borrowings be repaid? Were the borrowings used for legitimate purposes? Were the borrowings used to prop up Anglo's share price?

There are also questions about the behaviour of the board, the management of the bank, the auditors and the regulators.

The Stock Exchange's Combined Code on Corporate Governance is not mandatory. Non-compliance is permitted, provided it is explained. The Anglo Irish board availed of this comply-or-explain derogation in a number of ways.

For example, the board deviated from the combined code requirement that a former chief executive should not become chairman of the company. The combined code objective is that no one person in a company should dominate. This requirement is fundamental, and very few companies ignore it. By retaining his power in the company Mr FitzPatrick reduced the risk of his loans being disclosed.

Mr FitzPatrick served on the board since 1985, while another so-called independent director was appointed in 1988. Under the combined code nine years is the maximum period of service permitted for a non-executive director to be described as independent.

Seán FitzPatrick and Lar Bradshaw were what is called, interlocking directors - Seán FitzPatrick served on the board of the Dublin Docklands Development Authority where Lar Bradshaw was chairman and vice versa.

However, the board expressed its "complete satisfaction" that the independence of the directors was not compromised, notwithstanding these three breaches of best practice standards.

Management in the bank must have (or should have) known that the loans were to Mr FitzPatrick. Know-your-customer is a key requirement of money laundering regulations - that is why bank customers have to produce passports and utility bills when opening new bank accounts. Mr FitzPatrick must have had the assistance of one or more executives to move his borrowings to Irish Nationwide and back to Anglo Irish Bank each accounting year-end over an eight-year period.

This is bad for Ireland Inc. Everyone charged with the governance of public and public-interest companies has a duty to protect Ireland's reputation in world markets and confidence in its financial institutions for the good of all its citizens - none more than the financial regulator. It is, therefore, puzzling to learn that "warehousing" of Seán FitzPatricks borrowings in Irish Nationwide was discovered by financial regulator staff in January 2008, yet there was a delay of 11 months before a team of inspectors was sent to Anglo Irish Bank in early December 2008. Is this appropriately responsive to protect Ireland's reputation as a good place to do business?

Given that the office of the financial regulator knew about this transaction as far back as January 2008, why was it not raised during the all-night discussions in the Department of Finance in September prior to the introduction of the State guarantee scheme?

Another aspect I don't understand is why the financial regulator is reported as stating that it does not appear that anything illegal took place. Surely, at the very least, there is evidence of breach of the common law fiduciary duty for directors - that they do not put there own personal interests ahead of the company? Also, is not telling the truth in the financial statements an offence?

Seán Fitzpatrick has referred to Ireland's regulatory regime as "corporate McCarthyism". The New York Times dubbed Ireland "the wild west of European finance". Two very contrasting views!

In the golden days of the Celtic Tiger it was "light-touch regulation" all the way. But, are the risks associated with light-touch regulation justifiable? Does light-touch regulation safeguard the billions of funds invested in Ireland or will these funds be withdrawn to more reputable jurisdictions? Are the thousands of jobs in the financial services sector more secure by virtue of light-touch regulation? Are wealthy investors attracted to countries with a robust regulatory regime or with a light-touch regime?

In the final analysis, no laws, no rules, no regulations can prevent greedy, self-serving behaviour by company directors. All they can do is make such behaviour harder to engage in. Add to this, that greedy, self-serving people seek each other out. The old Irish phrase "Aithníonn ciaróg ciaróg eile" (one "beetle" recognises another) captures this aspect of corporate life beautifully.

Niamh Brennan is Michael MacCormac professor of management at University College Dublin, and is academic director of the Centre for Corporate Governance at UCD

This article appears in the print edition of the Irish Times


Bradshaw and FitzPatrick not only served together on the board of Anglo, which Bradshaw joined in 2004 – they were also both board members of the Dublin Docklands Developers Authority, which had a multi-billion budget to redevelop 1,300 acres in the faded docks area.

Anglo Irish Bank, Dublin Docklands Authority, Revolving Doors, DDDA

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Toxic Slag Permitted by Mr. Gormley's DDDA At Nature Site?


Apparently the Dublin Docklands Developers Authority has authorised the dumping of a mountain of potentially toxic slag beside Irishtown Nature Park. Apparently the EPA is toothless, indifferent and possibly even criminally negligent(a).


John Gormley, July 18, 2005. JG/RM.
Planning Application 4996/04


Following the Poolbeg Incinerator oral hearings the Bord Pleanala Inspector reported pollution from particles in Poolbeg was already at or above acceptable legal norms. The Inspector specified measures should be taken to reduce particle pollution during construction. So now, even before final approval from their EPA buddies on behalf of foreign corporations, DDDA+DCC is breaking this condition. With this reckless attitude why would DCC control invisible dioxins?

From Irishtown Nature Park.
November 2008.

The Dublin Docklands Developers Authority is a taxpayer funded quango in Mr J. Gormleys's control. The quango is used to perform Chinese style autocratic urban planning. For instance, the quango prevents access to the Bord Pleanala planning process by educated citizens. The quango hides information from the public.

Dumping the potentially toxic slag may be a pre-emptive action by DDDA+DCC or others to destroy the land used by Brent Geese (fresh water, flight paths). The reckless and possibly illegal work appears to be in advance of authorisation from their cronies in EPA-Ireland for a Waste-To-Toxins incinerator. Apparently EPA-Ireland will not investigate the "sand" - the fine public protectors first require a piece of paper, their usual excuse apparently.

Invisible 'fine particles' from this 80 foot high mountain blow over Sandymount, Irishtown and Ringsend damaging human health. But DCC & DDDA will say "you can not prove that".

_______
DCC's sewage factory stinks and wastes tens of millions of emergency tax-payer cash, signed for by Mr J Gormley in November 2008. Whether this unforseeable situation is due to corruption or bad engineering by DCC is an open question. However DCC is used to engineering schijt.

An efficiently managed Waste-To-Toxins incinerator would reduce life by 100,000 man-years in its first 15 years [British Society for Ecological Medicine]. An ineptly or possibly corruptly managed Waste-To-Toxins incinerator will cause tens to hundreds of premature deaths across Dublin, each year. Do you trust DCC with your life expectancy? Do you trust Covanta, a corporation with a curious regard for obeying the law in its home state of New Jersey.

(a) The EPA CharadeThe Philadelphia Inquirer's been running a good series about the toothless, indifferent and possibly even criminally negligent EPA.

http://crooksandliars.com/susie-madrak/epa-charade
_______
Please send any insights or validated corrections to galwaytent@gmail.com

Deadly Particles (PM2.5), Dublin Bay Incinerator, Dublin Docklands Authority, Gormley, Health, Law Breaking, PM2.5, Poolbeg Incinerator

Monday, November 10, 2008

Why Does EPA-Ireland Not Effectively Monitor Deadly Particles?

In Pennsylvania newspapers publish real-time deadly particle data, with explanations.


"Children with asthma can avoid the increased risk of an attack when PM 2.5 levels are high, and school districts can refer to the monitor on high pollution days to make informed decisions about calling off outdoor activities."Why Does EPA Ireland Prevent Publication
of
Real Time Data on Deadly Particles?

  • Why Does EPA-Ireland Not Effectively Monitor Deadly Particles?
  • Why is an ex 10-year-EPA-Director working for the Waste-To-Toxins incineration industry in Dublin at Rathcoole and Poolbeg?
  • Why did EPA-Ireland only issue a piece of paper about the Chromium-6 in Cork?

In August 2008 people were observed using hand-held instrumentation in the Poolbeg Area. The instrumentation used X-Rays to analyse local pollution, including heavy metals. The researchers claimed not to be funded by the EPA. Apparently the results have not been published. Why?


An incinerator is a gigantic deadly particle generator. Scientists and health experts have been unable to identify a safe level of exposure to these particles (“PM2.5”). PM 2.5 particles are about 30 times smaller than a human hair; several thousand of them could fit on the period of a typed sentence. Due to their extremely small size, particles travel deeply into the respiratory tract, reaching the deepest recesses of the lungs.

Monitors can provide data on PM 2.5, a fine air particulate linked to a variety of heart and lung ailments, in real time on an ongoing basis.


In Pennsylvania, pollution levels will be printed daily in the newspaper on the weather page and hour-by-hour updates will be posted on The Sentinel’s Web site.

“By continually providing the level of PM 2.5, CAB and its partners are hopeful this will actually improve area resident’s health.

“If they see it’s high and don’t go out and exercise,

that should keep some people out of the emergency room,”

Benjey said.”



Click this link for more information:
http://www.cumberlink.com/articles/2008/09/23/news/local/doc48d8df036b3b0762700325.txt


__________________________


Banana Republic's EPA

There may be good scientists in EPA-Ireland. However, with the director level revolving doors between EPA-Ireland and the waste-to-toxins industry ... The Bush Administration threatens its own EPA scientists.

Directors at EPA-Ireland do not provide actionable public data on deadly particles (“PM2.5, PM1.0”). It appears this is their “proof” there is no problem, an agenda of curious benefit to their future or past employers in the Waste-To-Toxins business. Generators of PM2.5 and of PM1.0 pollution such as power stations and cement plants are not identified and quantified. Real time data is not published. Health studies are not done to reinforce the "you have no proof" Big Lie.

Apparently Covanta (Poolbeg & Luxembourg) & Covanta-Energy-Answers (Rathcoole & Virgin Islands) have hired an ex-EPA Director to “consult” with the government. Covanta wants two Waste-To-Toxins incinerators at Poolbeg & Rathcoole. Covanta has been fined for law-breaking (dioxins - at all plants in New Jersey). Tobacco companies have also hired 'consultants' from regulators. Do Drug Dealers hire ex-Gardai?

Cork Harbour was polluted with Chromium-6 when the ex-Director was at the EPA, allegedly. Apparently EPA-Ireland just issued a piece of paper. Is this deception? Have there been deadly consequences in Cork?


Clean air initiative in Carlisle

http://www.cumberlink.com/articles/2008/09/23/news/local/doc48d8df036b3b0762700325.txt

Wednesday, November 5, 2008

Sandymount Sold Down The River Liffey By Labour?

Sandymount Sold Down The River Liffey By Labour?

Labour's Role in the Gormleymander of Sandymount.
http://www.electoralareacommittees.ie/Submissions%20Received/final_received_city/Cllr%20Kevin%20Humpherys%20South%20East%20Inner%20City%20Dublin.pdf


Has Councillor Humphreys been working with FF's Green Party and Sinn Fein to carve up Sandymount?

Why?

Councillor Humphreys provides a series of excellent arguments. First he clearly shows the damage created by a gerrymander. Then he moves on to the oxymoronic conclusion that this justifies carving up the historic Village of Sandymount.

Chinese style planning in Sandymount
Basically Councillor Humphreys seems to strongly support Sandymount being taken over by the anti-democratic Dublin Docklands Developers Authority. Because Sandymount was secretly added to the DDDA empire, in the dictatorial FF manner, the Councillor seems to be on board with the sophisticated strategic DDDA team players in their agenda to wedge Sandymount into their inner city brand, going forward. Councillor Humphreys seems to be an enthusiastic proponent of applying Chinese Section 25 planning to Sandymount.

Pejorative Big Lies
Councillor Humphreys motives are perhaps hinted at by his political use of the word affluent, a pejorative term often cynically applied to Sandymount(a). This appears to be similar to Dublin City Council's apparent usage of the equally pejorative Dublin 4 when spinning in the media for the Waste-To-Toxins incinerator. Hasn't President Bush adopted similar divide & rule politics to further vested interests such as Haliburton?

Zero Leadership
What results have local politicians actually achieved - for the public as opposed to themselves - on the most important local issue, the proposed Poolbeg Waste-To-Toxins incinerator? Pro-forma submissions to rigged Oral Hearings are not something to boast about. Most local politicians, especially the FF-Greens, have provided zero local leadership. This total lack of effective leadership to unite the people of Sandymount, Ringsend and Irishtown on the most important local issue is very curious. The gerrymander seems to prove this opinion.

The actual outcomes achieved by politicians in 2007 & 2008 are:
  1. Autocratic Chinese style planning in Sandymount, Ringsend & Poolbeg
  2. Gormleymandered division of Sandymount
  3. An ah sure we did our best Waste-To-Toxins incinerator.
___________________________


Councillor Humphreys Words Translated From The Original Nederlands

Councillor Humphreys Double Dutch:
Agencies like the HSE and the Drug Task Force operate across the entirety of the SEIC ward and separating this ward will make it more difficult for the synergy of services needed to combat the distinct challenges facing the community

Translated
Carving up Sandymount means the HSE can take money from Sandymount people and give the money to drug-addicts in the inner-city. Old people in Sandymount can now go whistle for a district nurse or for home care. The drug-dealers can develop houses in Sandymount, no questions asked; just cash.

---------------

Councillor Humphreys Double Dutch:
Dublin Dockland Development Authority remit on the south side of the City covers the Pembroke East … This interaction the DDDA fosters is creating a common identity within the Docklands and its hinterland that is binding the communities together, creating a community spirit.

Translated
Councillor Humphreys fully supports DDDA's land-grab into Sandymount and fully supports Fianna Fail's Dick Roach who apparently signed off on this feat in 2007. Furthermore Councillor Humphreys seems to fully support the expensive campaign of Big Lies from the DDDA – Big Lies used solely to benefit The Galway Tent banks and building developers.

---------------
Councillor Humphreys Double Dutch:
It is integral that the current composition of the SEIC ward remains intact.

Breaking up these areas will diminish the Councils capacity to co-ordinate efficiently.

If the is carved up again it will hinder an agency like X from operating in an efficient manner.

Interaction between elected officials and the Gardai has increased .. It makes no sense to split the jurisdiction.

This area would be best represented if it was left consolidated, instead of being marginalised in a larger area.


Translated
Councillor Humphreys seems to fully supports dis-integrating, breaking up, carving up, splitting, dis-intermediating and marginalising Sandymount.

---------------

Councillor Humphreys Double Dutch:
Move Pembroke East B [half of Sandymount] ... which [is] part of the hinterland of the Docklands and would be more appropriately placed in the X ward due to the development of the Poolbeg Peninsula by DDDA under section 25 of the planning act.

Translated
Councillor Humphreys absolutely seems to fully support Chinese style authoritarian planning in Sandymount.

_______________________
(a) The Galway Tent's rigging of local house prices means only drug dealers trading in the SEIC can now afford to buy houses in Sandymount.

(b) SEIC

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Don't Feed The Worms At Dublin City Council!

Feeding The Worms at Dublin City Council Creates A Monopoly to Benefit Foreign Corporations.







Don't Feed The Worms At Dublin City Council!

Should you immediately switch your bin collection to Panda? If you do nothing are you supporting the worms promoting DCC's Waste-To-Toxins incinerator which will degrade health all across Dublin?

Should you immediately remove all your assets from Anglo-Irish Bank? This includes cash and pension plan investments. If you do nothing are you supporting the worms wrecking Sandymount Strand and Dublin Bay?

Should you immediately tell BIFFO and John Gormley not to use taxpayer assets to bail out Anglo-Irish Bank? If you do nothing the increased charges on Ireland's National Debt will exceed the supposed cost savings gouged from old people's medical cards. That's if BIFFO doesn't turn Ireland-Inc into Iceland-Under-IMF-Administration-Inc.

  • Who benefits from the apparently legal Directorship and Consulting Doors Revolving between DCC, DDDA, Covanta, Energy Answers, EPA-Ireland and Anglo-Irish Bank?
  • So far, DCC has spent in excess of €19,000,000 to promote a one-sided case benefiting foreign corporations in the Waste-To-Toxins business. Cynically, no money has been available to provide balanced public information. Who is working for the taxpayers in Dublin?

  • DCC's competitor Panda said the main reason the city council wants to re-monopolise the collection system is because DCC has entered into a contract to provide 320,000 tonnes of rubbish per year for the planned municipal waste incinerator at Poolbeg in Dublin.


Monopolists Planning Dublin Bay

_________________________________________________

Council accused over waste collection services

MARY CAROLAN, Last Updated: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 19:09

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2008/1028/breaking72.htm

A waste collection company has claimed before the High Court that Dublin City Council is seeking to “re-monopolise” the household collection service in the capital.

The claim was made by counsel for Nurendale Ltd, trading as Panda Waste Services, Rathdrinagh, Beauparc Business Park, Navan, Co Meath.

Panda is seeking a court order to overturn the Council’s decision altering the existing waste permit regime, under which some private collectors operate in the market, to one where collection is carried out by the local authority or a single collector appointed by the council.

Panda claims moves to alter the current regime is an abuse of the Dublin local councils’ dominant market position. The company is also seeking damages.

Opening the case, Martin Hayden SC, for the company said there was a deliberate decision by the city council to “re-monopolise” the waste collection market.

Up to 1996, all household waste in Dublin had been collected by directly employed local authority workers. After 1996, a licensing system was introduced allowing private firms to operate. A number of such operators, including Panda, got involved.

Mr Hayden said the main reason the city council wants to re-monopolise the collection system is because it has entered into a contract to provide 320,000 tonnes of rubbish per year for the planned municipal waste incinerator at Poolbeg in Dublin.

The company is asking the court to judicially review a decision by the council, on behalf of all of the city’s four local authorities, to vary the Dublin waste management plan. Panda claims the decision is essentially an attempt to prohibit the collection of waste by the private sector.

Mr Hayden said comments made in correspondence by assistant city council manager, Matt Twomey, showed that it was the intended there would be no private operators in the market.

The city council says that it is its intention that collection of household waste will be by a single operator, either the local authority, or as a result of a tendering process.

Panda Waste was set up in 1990 and employs 250 people. It has an annual turnover of around €50m and some 28,000 domestic customers in Dublin. In 2005, the company implemented a business plan in which it focused on the domestic waste collection market, particularly in Dublin. It competed in Dun Laoghaire, Fingal and South Dublin Council areas and bought the Smurfit Recycling plant in Ballymount.

The case before Mr Justice Liam McKechnie continues.

© 2008 irishtimes.com

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Planners 'Inappropriate Links' with Developers.

Dermot Desmond's Allegations

(Paraphrased - see full newspaper reports below)

  • local authority attempted to change the City Development Plan "by the back door".
  • "development in Dublin is developer-led ..."
  • Dublin City Council has facilitated developers by changing planning law (aka 'zoning').
  • Dublin City Council was trying to get around the development plan.
  • "evidence of inappropriate links between planning officials and developers emerged before An Bord Pleanala"
  • City Architect Jim Barrett was acting outside the development plan
____________________________________________

What bags? What Baggage Charges?
Does O'Leary Fly bags to The Isle of Man?
____________________________________________

Another Revolving Door

"A serious conflict of interest arose when Jim Barrett, recently retired City Architect, arrived to give evidence as part of Sean Dunne's project team. Jim Barrett had attended pre-application consultations with the developers,"
  • Jim Barrett, recently retired City Architect
  • Jim Barrett gave evidence as part of Developer's project team.
I'm With Permanent-TSB - I'm Not with Aggro-Irish Bankers. Honest.


__________________
Desmond accuses Dublin's planners of 'inappropriate links' with the city's developers
By Cormac Murphy,
Thursday October 23 2008

One of the country's leading businessmen has written a scathing letter to Dublin's city manager slamming "inappropriate links" between council planners and developers.

And tycoon Dermot Desmond referred in his letter to meetings between city planners and developer Sean Dunne over the latter's skyscraper proposal for Ballsbridge.

Mr Desmond also criticised what he termed a five-year effort by Dublin City Council "to set the stage for intensive development" in the Dublin 4 suburb.

This "concerted" bid included proposals for landmark buildings, new apartment guidelines and a paper on high-rise development.

And he told the capital's top council official, John Tierney, that the local authority attempted to change the City Development Plan "by the back door" to facilitate builders.

Addressed to Mr Tierney, the letter was also sent to Environment Minister John Gormley and Dublin city councillors.

High-rise

One such councillor, Tom Stafford (Fianna Fail), told the Herald he agreed with much of what Mr Desmond said, in particular that the council is intent on following a high-rise policy.

Mr Desmond wrote: "I am on record, on a number of occasions, expressing my concern that development in Dublin is developer-led instead of being determined on proper planning and design principles."

He said "we now have real evidence that this is the case" following the recent Bord Pleanala hearings into Mr Dunne's plan for the Jurys/ Berkeley Court site and developer Ray Grehan's proposal for an adjacent piece of land.

"The sequence of events which unfolded demonstrated how Dublin City Council has facilitated the desire of developers to change the zoning, density and height guidelines applicable to Ballsbridge sites purchased for record amounts," Mr Desmond stated.

He added: "Arising from the An Bord Pleanala hearings, we now have copies of minutes of pre-application consultations between the developers and Dublin City Council.

"Clear markers were given at such meetings that parts of the proposed developments did not fall within the development plan. So the developers should have been asked to drastically reduce and alter their schemes.

"However, the worrying aspect is that planning officials at Dublin City Council were instead looking at other policy initiatives which would get around the development plan and facilitate development of the kind proposed for this triangle site in Ballsbridge."

He told the city manager "all of these pre-application consultations and the drafting of favourable policy papers ... took place on your watch".

Mr Desmond said "evidence of inappropriate links between planning officials and developers emerged before An Bord Pleanala".

"A serious conflict of interest arose when Jim Barrett, recently retired City Architect, arrived to give evidence as part of Sean Dunne's project team. Jim Barrett had attended pre-application consultations with the developers," he wrote.

A spokeswoman for the council said Mr Tierney would not be commenting as he is on leave and has not seen the letter.

- Cormac Murphy

_____________________

http://www.herald.ie/national-news/shockwaves-of-desmond-letter-start-council-row-1511444.html

He said that at the oral hearing it transpired Mr Dunne's architect "had brought models of a 32-storey tower, 37-storey tower and 40-storey tower to a meeting at Dublin City Council".

"Jim Barrett, city architect, suggested that the 37-storey was more 'elegant'," Mr Desmond said. He then "apparently made further suggestions concerning appropriate heights for other buildings which were ultimately reflected in the planning application".

Mr Desmond added: "While ultimately the planning authority refused permission for the 37-storey tower, it is clear that Jim Barrett was acting outside the development plan when even considering such tall buildings."

Monday, October 6, 2008

Poolbeg Incinerator Finances Built On House Of Cards

Independent.ie

Legal action threatens Poolbeg incinerator plan

By Paul Melia
Monday October 06 2008

A LANDMARK court case could result in the controversial Poolbeg incinerator being shelved.

Private waste collectors Greenstar and Panda are to ask the High Court to stop Dublin City Council limiting their activities in the city, and if successful it could throw the whole financial model for the waste-to-energy plant into doubt.

The council wants to tender out household waste collection routes in the city, saying that the current free-for-all is not working and is causing pollution because of the large number of bin trucks operating.

It proposes to allow companies to compete against each other to win household collection contracts, giving city bosses control of the waste stream.

This is essential because the council has entered into a 'put and pay' arrangement with the company which will operate the incinerator.

The agreement guarantees that a set amount of waste is sent for thermal treatment every year, or the council must pay a financial penalty.

However, two of the country's biggest private operators have sought a judicial review of the new regulations, which will be held in the High Court at the end of the month.

If they win the case, the council cannot guarantee a waste stream, and the whole financial model justifying the 600,000 tonne a year plant will be thrown into doubt.

"All of the infrastructure is based on owning the waste stream," one industry source said yesterday. "Everything stems from ownership of the waste.

"Poolbeg is fraught with difficulty. It's built on a house of cards and if one falls, the whole thing comes tumbling down. Dublin City Council must own and direct the waste."

Dublin City Council were not immediately available for comment, but Greenstar said that while incineration had a role in waste disposal, there was "no flexibility" in the system.

"Incineration has a role as an end of life disposal facility," spokesman Jerry Dempsey said.

"The Poolbeg one is too big and in the wrong place. Why lock into a system that offers no flexibility for the next 30 years?" he said.

The incinerator, which is opposed by Environment Minister John Gormley, was granted planning permission last November.

- Paul Melia

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Dublin Bay Task Force - Scam


Madam,

Whether the news that a Dublin Bay Task Force has been set up to deliver a "sustainable vision" master plan for the future use of the entire bay is good news or bad depends on a number of factors, including the composition, knowledge and real intent and purpose of the task force (July 17th).

Various proposals for the creation of a mini-Manhattan and the siting of an incinerator on the "Poolbeg peninsula" in Sandymount plus the infilling of Scotsman's Bay in Dún Laoghaire are the brainchildren of members of the task force. Environmental groups such as Sandymount and Merrion Residents' Association (set up 50 years ago to protect the south bay beaches), the Naturalists' Field Club, seal and dolphin groups, together with fishing and diving interests, amongst others, do not appear to have been consulted or included.

The need for hydrological, oceanographic and morphology studies has not received a mention. Relevant EU environmental directives are still being ignored as I write.

Unless and until the ecological value of the bay (sea and coastal lands) to our capital city and country is given precedence I will be forced to conclude that the main purpose of the task force will be to promote commercial development and the loss of Dublin and Dún Laoghaire harbours.

It would be nice to be proven wrong.

Yours, etc,

LORNA KELLY,

Castle Park,

Sandymount,

Dublin 4.


_________________________________________

Friday, July 18, 2008

Bono Elevated To Galway Tent

"[Bono's destruction of listed buildings] undermines ... the basis of the city's attractiveness for tourists".
Bord Pleanala Inspector.
Before His Execution.
___________________________________________________________________

The Purple & The Pinstripe.
_________________
BANANA REPUBLIC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF_HSCmnFTA


The purple and the pinstripe
Mutely shake their heads

A silence shrieking volumes
A violence worse than they condemn

Stab you in the back yeah
Laughing in your face

Glad to see the place again
It's a pity nothing's changed
_____________


Four Seasons - The Ice Bar - Brickie Section.

Did you hear the honorable executive board of Bord Pleanala only enters The Clarence using the Revolving Doors? These days Billy Gates can't get a job 'cause the band ain't hiring. But as for friends of An Bord Pleanala'a executive board, the Revolving Doors are always open .... ?

This time the Clarence's bouncer tore off the head of the Bord Pleanala Inspector before he pissed down his neck. The little schijt had said His Holiness Bono and Monsignor The Edge would destroy Georgian Dublin with their hotel featuring Holiness Bono's halo up on the roof.

Holiness Bono is the true saint, not Geldof. Saint Bob with The Boomtown Rats only sang about The Banana Republic, and that was 1978. Bono & Co truly embody the spirit of The Banana Republic and are The Boomtown Rats. Bono's so 20th century, oh yeah. A modern girl yeah, ga-ga-ga-ga-ga.

BANANA REPUBLIC
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aF_HSCmnFTA

____________________________

Senior inspector's strong disapproval rejected
[Extract]

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0718/1216330999704.html
[In Full]

FRANK McDONALD

AN BORD Pleanála approved plans to redevelop the Clarence Hotel in Dublin despite a strong recommendation by one of its senior planning inspectors that permission be refused because of its

  • "uncompromising, ominous and overstated" impact on the Liffey Quays. ...
  • "a significant loss of historic streetscape [ which] would undermine the integrity of the Liffey Quays conservation area".
  • conceptually brilliant but contextually illiterate
  • sets an "undesirable precedent" for the demolition of protected structures generally.

_______________